![]() ![]() 56% reported more efficient processes across the business.59% reported more efficient collaboration between teams.97% reported direct time savings as a result of using Shortcut.Here's what people said after switching to Shortcut: Jira is so ingrained in many organizations that it’s taken almost until now - we’re at a tipping point where it’s hindering rather than contributing to team efficiency and collaboration - to really consider an alternative option. ![]() Integrations exist, but often are not dynamic and still a manual process.Its project-centric system means visibility isn’t optimal, and it’s hard to see prioritization across teams.roadmaps have to be developed outside of Jira There is no standardization – Jira doesn’t have an opinion.Reporting is lacking both in basic capability and visualization.It’s quite old - you can tell from its outdated interface.Jira itself doesn’t have the functionality - it relies on add-ons which get messy.It’s not very user-friendly outside of the engineer/developer persona.Jira’s configuration takes a lot of expertise - meaning the full potential of Jira is not often reached.So what’s wrong with Jira for today’s software teams? To name a few things: Thankfully time has continued on and it’s no longer 2002. All of this was, you know, back in the day. Then, it morphed into one of the only ways for teams to manage the software development lifecycle. It was often implemented during the early growth stages of an organization. Back in 2002, Jira was one of only a few viable options for anyone looking for a simple bug tracking/ticketing system. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |